🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Authority In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Order: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing too much that system. Bring in the process guy and later bin him for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.