🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials asks for measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a pending law that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. In recent weeks, international health experts raised concerns that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

International experts actually suggests a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for different infractions “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the managing director of the African subsidiary says the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We exist in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The corporation runs its operations according with current country statutes. Further, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which enable relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.